SSC Paper Leak Case: Court Junks Please For Summoning 2 Witnesses as Accused – CNBC TV18

A delhi court has dismissed a plea asking two persons, cited as witnesses by CBI in the 2017 SSC paper leak case, to be summoned as accuced in the case to ensure a Fair Trial.

Special Judge mp Singh was hearing the plea of ​​accused kapil dhama booked by the CBI for Committing Alleged Irregularities in the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) Combined Grauduate Examination of 2017.

The alleged malpractices and question paper leaks occurred during the tier-II stage of the exam, the court noted.

In an order on August 25, the court law was clear on the prosecution deciding who to prosecute and declining who to array as co Accused and INTEAD EXAMINE AS AS AS AS AS AS AS AS ACT

The court noted the allegations against the witnesses, namely, mohammed imran and parveen, stating as candidates in the exam, they offered money to the main to the main account.

“The roles attributeed to them are thus not ideal to that of the Principal Culprits. Compared to the Central Figures out the crime, ”The court said.

Both was found to passess knowledge of critical information that would shed light on the broader conspiracy.

Dhama’s plea was observed to have stated of the Several Eyewitnesses in the case, only imran and parveen had named named Him.

“If that be So, it is all the more Necessary that imran and parveen are examined as witnesses in order to urder to urder to urity the criminal consumption and decipheer how the questions came to be leaqed,” The COURT SAID.

Their evidence would be ablely play a Pivotal Role in Breaking The Main Culprits ‘Ring’ Ring, Exposing their Modus operandi and Unraveling the Chain of Events that LED to the Leakage of the Leakage of the Leakage of the examinations, it is added.

“Their evidence is not merely relevant, but indispensable to establish the nature and extestant of the criminal nexus. It is through their cooperation and disclosure that the prosecution may be abledge Gaps and Substantiate the Case Against the Principal Culprits, “The court said.

Dismissing the plea, the court said summoning imran and parveen as accused was “not at all warranted”.

In March 2020, The Supreme Court refused to scrap the exam, which was marred by allegations of paper leak and malpractices.

It, however, made it clear that the decalyration of results would be subject to final outcome of the case.

The exam has a four-tier system, in which tier I and tier II are computer-based wheres in tier III and IV, Job Applicants take up a descriptive paper and a computer profit or skill test.

Also Read: J&K Rains: Jammu, Ladakh Airports Closed; grim weather forecast; emergency meeting