Delhi Court Acquits 6 in 2020 Riots Case, Raps Police

A delhi court on Monday Acquitted Six People in the 2020 Northeast Delhi Riots Case, While Taking Strong Exception to them Being Falsely Framed. The court also also pulled up the investment officer in the case for avoiding the defects, leading to an improper judgment.

“It is apparent that Merely in Order to work out a case, a false case has been found upon the accused and head constable vikas, the only ise witness of the case, is completion in the case of) These accused persons. All the accused are entitled to be acquitted of all the charges, ”The order is passed by additional sessions Judge Praveen Singh stated.

The Six People – Ishu Gupta, Prem Prakash, Raj Kumar, Manish Sharma, Rahul and Amit – Have Been Acquitted of Various Sections of Roting and Criminal Conspiracy.

Noting that being framed in a fake case has been to serial trampling of the right of the accused Persons, the court went on to pull up the investment officer (io) of the case, for Padding of Eviding of Evidence of Evidence Ignoring the glaning defects in the case.

“Such Instans Lead to Serious Erosion of the Fath of the People in the Investigating Process and The Rule of Law and TheRefore, I Deem It Approperate that Copy of this Judgement be served to the commamentor of political for his With a request to take remedial action, “The Judgement said.

Further, the court observed that the iO’s claim that he had seen one of the roters and knew Him from Before, Fell Apart, as the information was not recorded in the case diery.

Highlighting the Shoddy Investigation, The Court said the fact that one of the police witnesses, mohammad nasir, was attacked by the accused persons in the case, remained unveerified. Initially, nasir’s name was not written on the medicine legal report, but was laater added above another name alredy mentioned.

The court said that the mlc was completely silent about any injuries or fracture to the witness, as has been stated by nasir in his exam, hence there wonded the mlc indered to nasir.

Accusing the police, the court said that the investor Neither bothered to interrogate the doctor or the person who had allegedly daropped nasir to the hospital, to assertain the actual sequence of events. The bench supported the defense’s claim that facts of the case were cooked up at the police’s convenience.